Resources: Blogs

Just Google it

Blogs
|

Part 2: Age discrimination and technology in the workplace

In the modern day workplace, employers are becoming increasingly reliant on computer systems and introducing new forms of technology and equipment to increase productivity and output. It is often therefore a requirement that employees be proficient in certain computer programs or, at least, that they undergo training to become proficient.

In the modern day workplace, employers are becoming increasingly reliant on computer systems and introducing new forms of technology and equipment to increase productivity and output. It is often therefore a requirement that employees be proficient in certain computer programs or, at least, that they undergo training to become proficient.

Unsurprisingly, many employers (either consciously or unconsciously) shift their focus to investing in the training and development of younger employees, assuming that they are more receptive to technological changes.

This mindset has the potential to expose employers to discrimination claims by those employees who feel that they are either not given the same opportunities as younger employees or, in some cases, unreasonably directed by their employer to do something that they are not able to do by virtue of their age. A recent study by the Benevolent Society found that over half of the people surveyed who were over 65 years old had experienced some form of age discrimination in their employment, whether it be in the form of a joke, being patronised or simply being ignored.

Consider, by way of analogy, a 75 year old gentleman in Adelaide who made news headlines recently after his grandchildren gifted him an iPhone for his birthday. In an effort to embrace the new technology but with no idea how to use it, the gentleman approached his local Telstra store for instructions. The rather abrupt response from the staff at Telstra was that he should “just Google it”. Later that day, an Aldi employee, upon hearing this gentleman’s struggle whilst at the checkout, offered to give him some quick and helpful assistance.

If this gentleman were an employee who was directed to use a new piece of technology by his employer and, every time he sought assistance from management, was ignored or told to “just Google it”, the risks of that employee becoming disengaged and feeling indirectly discriminated against because of his age are increased.

It goes both ways

Whilst employers should take all reasonable steps to ensure that employees are provided with an opportunity to learn and understand a new process, it can be equally said that an employee must be willing to learn and adapt to these changes. Businesses will inevitably undergo technological upgrades and will introduce new systems and machinery to improve efficiency. It is also inevitable that employees will have to undergo training and development when these changes occur – any resistance to this aspect of a job leaves an employee at risk of becoming superfluous to the operation of the business.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

How pre-employment checks minimise the risk of post-recruitment discoveries

Skeletons in the closet

You have hired an employee who appears to be perfect on paper, only to later discover that they have misrepresented or deliberately withheld information about their qualifications, employment history or problematic past. A simple and often overlooked way of mitigating unfortunate surprises like these is conducting pre-employment checks to verify whether a candidate is as suitable, qualified and impressive as their resume or interview has portrayed them to be.

Read more...

Employer unlawfully discriminated against employee with breastfeeding responsibilities

It’s a tent-s situation

There are a number of personal attributes that are protected by Australia’s federal and state anti-discrimination laws, such as a person’s race, sex, pregnancy, marital status, family responsibilities, breastfeeding, age, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or intersex status.

Read more...

Managing Injured Employees - A Guide for Employers

In her usual entertaining and informative style, our Managing Director and Principal, Athena Koelmeyer, will guide employers through the tangled web of legislative obligations they face when dealing with an injured employee.

Read more...

Commission finds employer’s unsubstantiated allegations rendered dismissal unfair

Not mushroom for error

Where there is a factual dispute about allegations made against an employee, employers must ensure that the allegations are properly tested before proceeding to a disciplinary process. This will ensure that the employee has been provided with procedural fairness and any reasons relied on by the employer as grounds for dismissal are valid.

Read more...

Commission finds role with additional 88km travel time was not suitable alternative employment

The road less travelled

An employer may apply to the Fair Work Commission to have an employee’s redundancy pay reduced to a specified amount (which may be nil) in circumstances where it has obtained “other acceptable employment” for the employee.

Read more...

FWC finds Philippine-based worker entitled to claim unfair dismissal

Objection overruled

When engaging overseas workers to perform work for an Australian entity, employers need to be mindful of the risks that such workers may be considered employees to whom the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) might apply.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.