Resources: Blogs

Video on demand

Blogs
|

The danger to employers for employees caught behaving badly

The recent Australia Day off-field incident which involved an NRL Sydney Roosters player serves a warning to both employers and employees about the dangers of alcohol and social media.

The recent Australia Day off-field incident which involved an NRL Sydney Roosters (the Club) player serves a warning to both employers and employees about the dangers of alcohol and social media.

The player was filmed on camera stimulating a lewd act with a dog at a private party.

The player and some other team mates attended the party after the Club’s sanctioned Sydney Harbour cruise which took place earlier in the day had ended.

As a result of his actions, the player was fined $75,000 ($125,000 fine with $50,000 suspended) and suspended for eight weeks following an agreement between the Club and the NRL.

In this circumstance, the NRL and the Club were required to intervene and sanction the player for a variety of reasons including:

  • The nature of his conduct;
  • The reputational damage to the NRL and the Club – the same player had been involved in a previous off-field incident in 2014; and
  • The pressure from third parties and fans – there was certainly plenty of media commentary on how and why the player should be banned from the NRL for life and that the incident would bring about the end of his career.

This incident also highlights the potential issues and / or adverse implications for employers when an employee’s inappropriate or unacceptable conduct is captured and then publicised – for example, damage to the employer’s brand (business reputation) and/or loss of customers/clients.

The candid video of the player was filmed by another partygoer without his consent and then sold to a media agency who on sold it to Channel Nine, News Corp and Fairfax. The Club sought legal advice about whether to pursue legal action against those responsible for filming and then selling the video.

Looking at this in the broader workplace context, unfortunately, the incident raises an additional consideration for employers when planning the next office work party or function – what to do about smart phones.

 

Should employers go as far as banning smart phone devices from the parties?

Smart phones provide ample opportunity for an employee’s embarrassing or objectionable conduct at the office party or even when the party “kicks on” to another gathering to be recorded and then shared throughout the workplace and/or via social media – often without the consent of the employee. Employers should consider cautioning all employees about the use of smart phones during work events - obviously if everyone behaves then there will be no problem and no need to consider restricting the use of smart phones or the taking of photographs at such events.

 

Lessons to learn

In addition to carefully planning the next event – in terms of food, drink & location – employers must ensure employees are told what is expected in terms of their behaviour and what could happen if employees fail to meet those expectations. An employer’s code of conduct should contemplate circumstances where an employee’s actions bring the organisation into disrepute – allowing the employer to step in when situations such as this one arise.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

Commission finds inappropriate social media use formed valid reason for dismissal

Message delivered

A recent decision of the Fair Work Commission has confirmed that an employee’s inappropriate use of social media group chats may form a valid reason for dismissal, particularly when matters relating to work are discussed.

Read more...

The importance of making policies accessible and easy to understand

Tell me in layman’s terms

Drafting workplace policies and procedures can be a daunting exercise – it requires a careful balance of including (or omitting) information that is necessary from a legal standpoint, whilst still remaining easy to understand and follow for employees.

Read more...

Prevention is better than a cure

Planning end of year work celebrations

As the end of another year approaches, employers are understandingly planning a well-earned opportunity for employees to celebrate the year that has been.

Read more...

Commission finds employer’s unsubstantiated allegations rendered dismissal unfair

Not mushroom for error

Where there is a factual dispute about allegations made against an employee, employers must ensure that the allegations are properly tested before proceeding to a disciplinary process. This will ensure that the employee has been provided with procedural fairness and any reasons relied on by the employer as grounds for dismissal are valid.

Read more...

Commission finds role with additional 88km travel time was not suitable alternative employment

The road less travelled

An employer may apply to the Fair Work Commission to have an employee’s redundancy pay reduced to a specified amount (which may be nil) in circumstances where it has obtained “other acceptable employment” for the employee.

Read more...

FWC finds Philippine-based worker entitled to claim unfair dismissal

Objection overruled

When engaging overseas workers to perform work for an Australian entity, employers need to be mindful of the risks that such workers may be considered employees to whom the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) might apply.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.