Advertising for female only staff

The real employees (of Melbourne)

May 26, 2016

In an attempt to reduce the gender imbalance in Melbourne University’s School of Mathematics and Statistics, the University is now advertising three permanent positions exclusively for female applicants only.

This raises some interesting points of discussion about discrimination laws in Australia. There are a number of laws in Australia applicable to discrimination in employment on the basis of gender including the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth), Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (Vic) and the Anti Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW). Generally speaking this legislation renders it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against a person when determining who should be offered employment on the basis of a protected attribute, such as gender.

However, anti discrimination laws also allow for “positive discrimination” and permits measures to be introduced in pursuit of promoting or creating substantive equality for members of a group with a particular attribute.

In the University’s case, the decision to exclusively open the applications purely for female applicants is with the intention to promote change and reduce the gender imbalance in the School of Mathematics and Statistics. The University is aware that females are underrepresented in the fields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics and by advertising for female applicants it hopes to address the imbalance. Currently, only about a quarter of all mathematics academics in Australia are female.

These measures are referred to generally as “special measures” and in some jurisdictions require an application to use the special measures to be approved. To have an application approved, the person seeking to introduce the measures must be able to be prove that it is for the purposes of achieving equality. The actions also need to be justified to show that members of the group (i.e. female academics in this example) have a particular need for advancement or assistance.

In Victoria, employers do not need to apply to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal for approval of “special measures”. However, NSW employers seeking to implement “special measures” need to apply to the Anti Discrimination Board to get an approval prior to advertising for a position.

Employers are also reminded that the deadline for reporting to Workplace Gender Equality Agency is fast approaching (31 May 2016).

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Employer ordered to pay damages for unlawful discrimination of employee with breastfeeding responsibilities

Let’s assess the damage

In October 2023, we reported on a decision of the Australian Capital Territory Civil and Administrative Tribunal that found an employer had unlawfully discriminated against an employee because of her breastfeeding responsibilities. The Tribunal has now handed down its decision in relation to the remedies flowing from that contravention.

March 3, 2025

Blogs

How pre-employment checks minimise the risk of post-recruitment discoveries

Skeletons in the closet

You have hired an employee who appears to be perfect on paper, only to later discover that they have misrepresented or deliberately withheld information about their qualifications, employment history or problematic past. A simple and often overlooked way of mitigating unfortunate surprises like these is conducting pre-employment checks to verify whether a candidate is as suitable, qualified and impressive as their resume or interview has portrayed them to be.

October 22, 2024

Blogs

Employer unlawfully discriminated against employee with breastfeeding responsibilities

It’s a tent-s situation

There are a number of personal attributes that are protected by Australia’s federal and state anti-discrimination laws, such as a person’s race, sex, pregnancy, marital status, family responsibilities, breastfeeding, age, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or intersex status.

October 30, 2023

FWC finds employer’s assumptions about employee’s capacity rendered dismissal unfair

You need to chill out

If an employer is questioning the capacity of an ill or injured worker’s ability to fulfil the inherent requirements of their position, they may consider testing the legitimacy of an employee’s prognoses and medical advice. In these circumstances, the employer should be aware of their obligations to the employee and the potential consequences of failing to satisfy them.

March 27, 2025

Blogs

FWC finds dismissal harsh and unreasonable given employer’s communication blunder of policy changes

Sliding into your DM’s

It is best practice for employers to ensure that their policies and procedures are properly communicated and understood by employees, especially in circumstances where the policy relates to important topics such as the health and safety of employees.

March 27, 2025

Blogs

Poor redundancy process results in successful workers compensation claim

Coffee catastrophe

There are a number of legal obligations and risks that an employer must consider when implementing any form of disciplinary or dismissal process. These are not limited to claims made under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) but can also include the risk of claims made under anti-discrimination or workers compensation legislation.

March 13, 2025

Resources: Blogs

The real employees (of Melbourne)