Resources: Blogs

Need not apply

Blogs
|

Anglo Saxon applicants preferred in online job advertisement

Job advertisements should be carefully drafted to ensure that they focus on the essential skills of the position and not any irrelevant or subjective factors.

Recently, a job advertisement from a Sydney Optus store was the subject of media attention for its discriminatory language. The job advertisement placed on Seek for a casual retail consultant at its Neutral Bay store stated that candidates who were “Anglo Saxon” and lived near Neutral Bay were preferred.

The advertisement prompted the question – had this Optus store engaged in discriminatory conduct that is considered unlawful under Australia’s anti-discrimination laws?

State and Federal anti-discrimination laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of a particular attribute. These attributes include race, sex, sexual preference, age, physical or mental disability, marital status or family or carer’s responsibilities. These anti-discrimination laws also prohibit unlawful discrimination in employment against a person on the basis of a protected attribute.

For example, section 15 of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) (RD Act) provides that employers cannot:

  • Refuse or fail to employ a person for work which is available and for which the person is qualified;
  • Refuse or fail to offer or afford the same terms and conditions of employment or opportunities for training and promotion; or
  • Dismiss an employee from their employment,

due to that person’s race, colour, or national or ethnic origin.

This also extends to recruitment including job advertisements, where it is unlawful to publish a discriminatory advertisement which treats job seekers less favourably on the basis of a protected attribute. In this case, non-Anglo-Saxon candidates were to be treated less favourably, in that they were not “preferred”.

After being alerted to the advertisement, Optus promptly took it down, stating that it was in breach of Optus’ own standards and commitment to equal opportunity. Optus has since conducted an investigation into the incident and has taken disciplinary action against the persons involved.

Lessons for employers

Employers should be mindful of discrimination in the recruitment process and have an open and equal opportunity recruitment strategy. Job advertisements should be carefully drafted to ensure that they focus on the essential skills of the position and not any irrelevant or subjective factors. By doing so, employers will eliminate discrimination in the recruitment process, get the best person for the position and minimise reputational risks to the business.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

How pre-employment checks minimise the risk of post-recruitment discoveries

Skeletons in the closet

You have hired an employee who appears to be perfect on paper, only to later discover that they have misrepresented or deliberately withheld information about their qualifications, employment history or problematic past. A simple and often overlooked way of mitigating unfortunate surprises like these is conducting pre-employment checks to verify whether a candidate is as suitable, qualified and impressive as their resume or interview has portrayed them to be.

Read more...

Employer unlawfully discriminated against employee with breastfeeding responsibilities

It’s a tent-s situation

There are a number of personal attributes that are protected by Australia’s federal and state anti-discrimination laws, such as a person’s race, sex, pregnancy, marital status, family responsibilities, breastfeeding, age, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or intersex status.

Read more...

Managing Injured Employees - A Guide for Employers

In her usual entertaining and informative style, our Managing Director and Principal, Athena Koelmeyer, will guide employers through the tangled web of legislative obligations they face when dealing with an injured employee.

Read more...

Commission finds employer’s unsubstantiated allegations rendered dismissal unfair

Not mushroom for error

Where there is a factual dispute about allegations made against an employee, employers must ensure that the allegations are properly tested before proceeding to a disciplinary process. This will ensure that the employee has been provided with procedural fairness and any reasons relied on by the employer as grounds for dismissal are valid.

Read more...

Commission finds role with additional 88km travel time was not suitable alternative employment

The road less travelled

An employer may apply to the Fair Work Commission to have an employee’s redundancy pay reduced to a specified amount (which may be nil) in circumstances where it has obtained “other acceptable employment” for the employee.

Read more...

FWC finds Philippine-based worker entitled to claim unfair dismissal

Objection overruled

When engaging overseas workers to perform work for an Australian entity, employers need to be mindful of the risks that such workers may be considered employees to whom the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) might apply.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.