Are you affected by the zombie agreement deadline?

Spooky season

November 21, 2023

As part of the introduction of the Fair Work system for Australia’s national workplace relations system ushered in by the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (Cth) provided for the continued existence and application of industrial instruments created under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) or before the FW Act commenced.

As part of the introduction of the Fair Work system for Australia’s national workplace relations system ushered in by the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act), the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (Cth) (Transitional Act) provided for the continued existence and application of industrial instruments created under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) or before the FW Act commenced.

These “agreement based transitional instruments” and were created pre-2010 and included certified agreements, collective agreements and Australian Workplace Agreements (AWAs) and have been referred to as “zombie” agreements. While over time most of these agreements had ceased to operate because new enterprise agreements were negotiated or because they were terminated by the Fair Work Commission (FWC), there was still a significant number which continued to operate, raising concern that affected employees were receiving less beneficial terms and conditions compared to the applicable modern award.

The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth) passed by the Federal Government last year amended the Transitional Act so that these zombie agreements would automatically terminate by 7 December 2023, unless an application was made to the FWC to have them continue to operate.

The FWC has released an interactive checklist to assist employers to check whether they or their employees are covered by a zombie agreement which continues to operate. This interactive checklist can be found here.

Employers who are unsure if they are covered by a zombie agreement which continues to be in operation should use the checklist or to reach out to us at Workplace Law.

‍

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.‍

Commission finds no objective or rational connection between an employee’s age and his flexible working request to work from home

The age of flexibility

An employee will only be eligible to request a flexible working arrangement if they are able to demonstrate that there is a sufficient nexus between one of the prescribed circumstances under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and the request itself.

Employer’s “tick and flick” training on workplace policies rendered dismissal unfair

Not just the what, but also the why

When relying on a workplace policy as grounds for dismissal, employers must be able to clearly demonstrate that the employee is aware of the policy and has undergone meaningful training on the policy.

Commission finds employer’s unsubstantiated allegations rendered dismissal unfair

Not mushroom for error

Where there is a factual dispute about allegations made against an employee, employers must ensure that the allegations are properly tested before proceeding to a disciplinary process. This will ensure that the employee has been provided with procedural fairness and any reasons relied on by the employer as grounds for dismissal are valid.

Resources: Blogs

Spooky season