Resources: Blogs

A rose by any other name?

Blogs
|

Beware of racial discrimination in the recruitment process

One of the potential dangers to businesses in the recruitment and selection process is to omit an applicant with a name which may indicate their race, descent, national or ethnic origin from the selection process.

In his Logie Award acceptance speech, journalist and TV presenter Waleed Aly referenced an interaction he had with an actor that night. Aly recalled that the actor told him that he was not able to use his birth name Mustafa, because he would not be able to get a job in the TV industry.

Aly’s speech highlighted one of the potential dangers to businesses in the recruitment and selection process – omitting from the selection process an applicant with a name which may indicate their race, descent, national or ethnic origin.

The incidence of this racial discrimination is not confined to the showbiz industry. Recently, accommodation website Airbnb also came under scrutiny after a Harvard Business School study revealed that requests by users with African- American names or profiles were 16% less likely to be accepted than non-African-American users. One user demonstrated the discrimination when two profiles were created – a request from the profile which had an African-American name was rejected while another fake profile with a different name was accepted.

The Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) (RD Act) provides that it is unlawful to directly or indirectly discriminate against a person on the base of their race, colour, descent or national or ethnic origin.

Under section 15 of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) (RD Act) employers cannot refuse or fail to employ a person (in work which is available and for which the person is qualified) due to that person’s race, colour, or national or ethnic origin. The RD Act also provides that it is unlawful to refuse to employ a person on the basis of the race, colour or national or ethnic origin of the person’s relative or associate (this can be for example, their spouse, parents etc).

Last month, the Victorian Government launched a pilot project “Recruit Smarter” which aims to address unconscious bias in the recruitment process.

The program will assess the personal details (such as name, gender, age) which should be de-identified to avoid potential bias. The program is supported by organisations from both the government and private sector, including Australia Post, the University of Melbourne, Ambulance Victoria and Westpac.

 

Tips for employers

The Airbnb scenario is a potential risk to employers in the recruitment process. Employers may wish to institute recruitment procedures where identifiers such as name, country of birth etc are removed from applicant’s applications so that each application is assessed on skills, experience etc.

Employers should also regularly conduct workplace training on what is and what isn’t unlawful workplace discrimination and institute anti-discrimination policies to remind employees that discrimination is unlawful and not acceptable.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

How pre-employment checks minimise the risk of post-recruitment discoveries

Skeletons in the closet

You have hired an employee who appears to be perfect on paper, only to later discover that they have misrepresented or deliberately withheld information about their qualifications, employment history or problematic past. A simple and often overlooked way of mitigating unfortunate surprises like these is conducting pre-employment checks to verify whether a candidate is as suitable, qualified and impressive as their resume or interview has portrayed them to be.

Read more...

Employer unlawfully discriminated against employee with breastfeeding responsibilities

It’s a tent-s situation

There are a number of personal attributes that are protected by Australia’s federal and state anti-discrimination laws, such as a person’s race, sex, pregnancy, marital status, family responsibilities, breastfeeding, age, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or intersex status.

Read more...

Managing Injured Employees - A Guide for Employers

In her usual entertaining and informative style, our Managing Director and Principal, Athena Koelmeyer, will guide employers through the tangled web of legislative obligations they face when dealing with an injured employee.

Read more...

Commission finds employer’s unsubstantiated allegations rendered dismissal unfair

Not mushroom for error

Where there is a factual dispute about allegations made against an employee, employers must ensure that the allegations are properly tested before proceeding to a disciplinary process. This will ensure that the employee has been provided with procedural fairness and any reasons relied on by the employer as grounds for dismissal are valid.

Read more...

Commission finds role with additional 88km travel time was not suitable alternative employment

The road less travelled

An employer may apply to the Fair Work Commission to have an employee’s redundancy pay reduced to a specified amount (which may be nil) in circumstances where it has obtained “other acceptable employment” for the employee.

Read more...

FWC finds Philippine-based worker entitled to claim unfair dismissal

Objection overruled

When engaging overseas workers to perform work for an Australian entity, employers need to be mindful of the risks that such workers may be considered employees to whom the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) might apply.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.