Changes proposed for the NSW Industrial Relations Commission

Court in the middle

September 12, 2016

The NSW Government has proposed changes to the exercise of functions by the NSW Industrial Relations Commission (NSW IRC) in response to a marked decreased workload level.

The NSW Government has proposed changes to the exercise of functions by the NSW Industrial Relations Commission (NSW IRC) in response to a marked decreased workload level.

The Commission is primarily responsible for the conciliation and determination of unfair dismissal applications, industrial disputes and the approval of awards and enterprise agreements in the NSW public sector, including NSW local councils.

It is intended that the judicial functions of the NSW IRC (currently exercised by the Industrial Court) be transferred to the NSW Supreme Court and to be exercised by Judges within the Common Law Division of the Supreme Court. Part of the proposal will see President Walton the current sole Judge of the Industrial Court, be appointed as a Judge of the Supreme Court.

The NSW Government has claimed that this will allow matters to be allocated more efficiently and with greater diversity as there would be a larger number of judges who could be allocated a matter.

The workload of the Industrial Court was highlighted to have decreased in the ten years from 766 matters commenced in 2005 to just 35 matters in 2015. The reduction in workload was claimed to be due to changes in the industrial relations system, including the introduction of the national workplace relations system, and changes which saw work health and safety prosecutions transferred to the NSW District Court in 2010.

At present, there is no proposal to change the non-judicial functions of the NSW IRC (as performed by the Commission). However, it is intended that a new Chief Commissioner be appointed to be the head of the NSW IRC, increasing the number of Commissioners up from four to five Commissioners.

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Fair Work Commission critical of investigation process despite the employer’s valid reason for dismissal

Less is more

Employers often see the disciplinary process as an opportunity to raise every single indiscretion by an employee – even though the issues occurred in the past or are minor in nature when compared to other misconduct. However, this approach can weaken the employer’s position, rather than strengthen the decision to dismiss.

February 9, 2021

Blogs

Workplace Relations Review

Cases and Legislation June 2020

Cases and Legislation June 2020 NEWS ALERTS NSW Work Health Safety Legislation Amendments The Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) (WHS Act) was recently amended giving effect to some of the recommendations of the 2018 national review of the modern WHS Act. ...

July 1, 2020

News Alerts

Workplace Relations Review

Cases and Legislation February 2020

Cases and Legislation February 2020 Post-Employment Conduct “Ex-employee fined for contempt after breaching Court undertakings" Maxilift Australia Pty Ltd v Donnelly [2020] SASC 8 Executive summary A former sales manager has been fined $7,115 and found in contempt of...

February 21, 2020

News Alerts

Industrial Disputes

FWC finds employer’s assumptions about employee’s capacity rendered dismissal unfair

You need to chill out

If an employer is questioning the capacity of an ill or injured worker’s ability to fulfil the inherent requirements of their position, they may consider testing the legitimacy of an employee’s prognoses and medical advice. In these circumstances, the employer should be aware of their obligations to the employee and the potential consequences of failing to satisfy them.

March 27, 2025

Blogs

FWC finds dismissal harsh and unreasonable given employer’s communication blunder of policy changes

Sliding into your DM’s

It is best practice for employers to ensure that their policies and procedures are properly communicated and understood by employees, especially in circumstances where the policy relates to important topics such as the health and safety of employees.

March 27, 2025

Blogs

Poor redundancy process results in successful workers compensation claim

Coffee catastrophe

There are a number of legal obligations and risks that an employer must consider when implementing any form of disciplinary or dismissal process. These are not limited to claims made under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) but can also include the risk of claims made under anti-discrimination or workers compensation legislation.

March 13, 2025

Resources: Blogs

Court in the middle