Resources: Blogs

System Alert

Blogs
|

Why businesses should have compliant employment and payroll processes

Recenty, MAdE Establishment Group (the Group) and its celebrity chef director and founder went public with a mea culpa that it underpaid the wages of at least 162 employees across its Melbourne restaurants.

Recenty, MAdE Establishment Group (the Group) and its celebrity chef director and founder went public with a mea culpa that it underpaid the wages of at least 162 employees across its Melbourne restaurants.

The Group issued the public apology to employees for the underpayments which relate to the calculation of overtime rates and the incorrect classification of employees under the Modern Award for the past six years. The employees have since been repaid up to a total of $2.6 million.

In 2015, the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) alerted the Group of its concerns with the payment of wages to employees but no action was taken at that time. The Group has since agreed that it will work collaboratively with the FWO.

The full extent of the underpayments and process failures were not discovered until a Chief Executive Officer was appointed to the Group in October 2016. An internal review was ordered which identified issues in the payroll processes resulting in the incorrect classification of employees and miscalculation of overtime and in some cases, the overpayment of employee salaries. A full external report by KPMG later confirmed issues with the Groups processes and the incorrect payment of employees.

The Group acknowledged that the business, which was established in 2006, did not have adequate payroll and human resources systems to cope with its growth and size. The Group assured employees that it has since appointed the CEO and a Human Resources Manager and has put in place processes and systems necessary for the business.

For employers, the Group’s mishap demonstrates the importance of establishing compliant employment processes and payroll systems from the start of a business. Such processes include:

  • Having a contract of employment which is compliant with the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) and the relevant Modern Award;
  • Checking if an employee is covered by a Modern Award and correctly classifying the employee under that Modern Award;
  • Setting up payroll system to facilitate paying employees their applicable minimum entitlements (for example relevant overtime or penalty rates and superannuation); and
  • Having good employment record keeping practices. The FW Act obliges employers to keep, amongst other things, pay and leave records for seven years.

Start-ups and small businesses in particular may think that they don’t need to worry about having proper HR and payroll systems. However, as can be seen from this case, there are wide ranging financial and brand damage ramifications for being non-compliant and/or having inadequate HR and payroll systems.

 

Similar articles

$15.3 million in penalties imposed on sushi restaurants and director for serious contraventions

Put your records on

The director and Chief Executive Officer of a group of four sushi restaurants which operated in NSW, the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory was recently ordered to pay $1.6 million for her involvement in contraventions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) by the Federal Court of Australia.

Read more...

FWO secures penalties against bar operator and external accounting firm

Closing time

The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) requires employers to keep certain employee records for a period of 7 years. These records are necessary to ensure that employees have been paid their minimum entitlements should an underpayment claim be made.

Read more...

Underpaying employer ordered to pay $475,200 in penalties

Pecuniary penalties no longer a matter of degrees

The Federal Court of Australia has issued one of its first penalty decisions since the High Court of Australia’s decision earlier this year of Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Pattinson [2022] HCA 13.

Read more...

Commission finds employer’s unsubstantiated allegations rendered dismissal unfair

Not mushroom for error

Where there is a factual dispute about allegations made against an employee, employers must ensure that the allegations are properly tested before proceeding to a disciplinary process. This will ensure that the employee has been provided with procedural fairness and any reasons relied on by the employer as grounds for dismissal are valid.

Read more...

Commission finds role with additional 88km travel time was not suitable alternative employment

The road less travelled

An employer may apply to the Fair Work Commission to have an employee’s redundancy pay reduced to a specified amount (which may be nil) in circumstances where it has obtained “other acceptable employment” for the employee.

Read more...

FWC finds Philippine-based worker entitled to claim unfair dismissal

Objection overruled

When engaging overseas workers to perform work for an Australian entity, employers need to be mindful of the risks that such workers may be considered employees to whom the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) might apply.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.