Resources: Blogs

Coronavirus

Blogs
|

A Guideline for Employers

In recent times there has been widespread publicity about the outbreak of a respiratory illness caused by a coronavirus, which has spread from the Hubei province in China and has since been identified in other countries, including Australia.

In recent times there has been widespread publicity about the outbreak of a respiratory illness caused by a coronavirus, which has spread from the Hubei province in China and has since been identified in other countries, including Australia.

On 30 January 2020, the World Health Organization declared the novel coronavirus outbreak a “public health emergency of international concern.”

The Australian Government has announced temporary measures to manage the risk of the virus spreading in Australia. These temporary measures include:

  • Australia will deny entry to anyone who has left or transited mainland China as of 1 February 2020 (with the exception of Australian citizens or permanent residents and their immediate family members, as well as airline and maritime crews that have taken appropriate measures);
  • All travellers arriving from any part of mainland China will be subject to enhanced border control measures and will be required to self-isolate for 14 days from the time they left mainland China; and
  • The travel advice for China has been updated to “Level 4 - Do not travel”.

Whilst the risk of infection in Australia remains relatively low and there are still only a limited number of cases of the coronavirus in Australia, employers should consider what their obligations are to their employees and how they can manage the risk of exposure in their workplace.

For employees who have travelled to mainland China in recent times, or have family who have travelled in China, it is important that they remain mindful of their health condition in the weeks following their return to Australia and take an extra cautious approach. This might involve self-isolation for at least 14 days, as required by the Australian Government.

If an employee starts experiencing symptoms that might indicate the presence of the virus or an illness generally, the employee should be advised to see a doctor immediately and obtain full clearance before returning to the workplace. This should include confirmation that the employee is no longer contagious.

Employers should review any arrangements for travel to and from China for work. In light of the Government’s travel advice, travel to mainland China should not be undertaken unless absolutely necessary.

If there is a serious risk of exposure or the status of the coronavirus in Australia worsens, then employers may consider imposing their own quarantine period to manage the risk of exposure to other employees before allowing travelling employees (regardless of their travel destinations) to return to work and interact with the rest of the workplace.

The priority for employers should be to ensure the health and safety of the workplace and to minimise any risks of illness to their employees. However, this should be balanced with a reasonable approach to management of this outbreak. Employer’s should regularly check for updates from reliable resources (such the websites of the Departments of Health and Home Affairs) to monitor the situation and its potential impacts on the workplace.

Employees should be provided with accurate information about the coronavirus and reminded that they also have obligations to take proper care of themselves and their work colleagues. This can be done by sending a communication to employees about this new risk and reminding employees of the employer’s position on managing illness in the workplace.

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Similar articles

Company vicariously liable for injury resulting from skylarking supervisor

All in good fun

Enjoying the company of your colleagues is something most people hope to find in the workplace. It can make work much more enjoyable and lead to lasting friendships. However, fun in the workplace can cross a line when it takes the form of dangerous skylarking or roughhousing.

Read more...

Salary reduction brought employee under high income threshold

Below not above

The COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic has significantly impacted the financial stability of many businesses. Employers have had to make difficult decisions and implement different measures to ensure the ongoing viability of their businesses. Some of these measures have included asking employees to agree to temporary reductions in their hours of work or to a reduction in their remuneration.

Read more...

Managing employee conduct and behaviour in the workplace

Draw the line

Managing employee conduct and behaviour can be a challenge. The question of what is appropriate and what is not appropriate in the workplace will depend on a variety of factors, including the industry in which the employees work, the overall culture of the workplace and community standards at any given time.

Read more...

Commission finds no objective or rational connection between an employee’s age and his flexible working request to work from home

The age of flexibility

An employee will only be eligible to request a flexible working arrangement if they are able to demonstrate that there is a sufficient nexus between one of the prescribed circumstances under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and the request itself.

Read more...

Employer’s “tick and flick” training on workplace policies rendered dismissal unfair

Not just the what, but also the why

When relying on a workplace policy as grounds for dismissal, employers must be able to clearly demonstrate that the employee is aware of the policy and has undergone meaningful training on the policy.

Read more...

Commission finds employer’s unsubstantiated allegations rendered dismissal unfair

Not mushroom for error

Where there is a factual dispute about allegations made against an employee, employers must ensure that the allegations are properly tested before proceeding to a disciplinary process. This will ensure that the employee has been provided with procedural fairness and any reasons relied on by the employer as grounds for dismissal are valid.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.