Resources: Blogs

Clarity

Blogs
|

FWC decision reminds employers about the need to be clear about termination dates

Fair Work Commission’s (FWC) Full Bench decision in Mohammed Ayub v NSW Trains [2016] FWCFB 5500 (Ayub Case) is a good reminder for employers about the need for clarity with respect to termination of employment and in particular when a termination is to take effect.

Fair Work Commission’s (FWC) Full Bench decision in Mohammed Ayub v NSW Trains [2016] FWCFB 5500 (Ayub Case) is a good reminder for employers about the need for clarity with respect to termination of employment and in particular when a termination is to take effect.

Mr Ayub lodged an application for unfair dismissal and there was a dispute between the parties as to the correct date of termination of employment. This was significant in terms of determining whether or not Mr Ayub was outside the 21 day time limit under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) for lodging an unfair dismissal application and whether the FWC had jurisdiction to hear the matter.

The FWC Full Bench stated that the “general principle” is that an employer must communicate to the employee using both plain language and show by conduct that the contract is terminated. Where communication is in writing, it must have been received by the employee in order for the termination to be effective.

In the Ayub Case, Mr Ayub was sent an email by NSW Trains on 18 January 2016 to his wife’s email address. Mr Ayub was not aware of his dismissal until 19 January 2016 when he saw and opened the email. The Full Bench found that Mr Ayub’s dismissal did not take effect earlier than 18 January 2016, despite NSW Trains making the decision on 14 January 2016, and the letter being dated 14 January 2016.

Employers are reminded of the following best practice tips as a result of the Ayub Case:

  • Specify how the letter is delivered to the employee (whether it is “by hand”, “by express post” etc). In the Ayub Case the letter was sent by email but was headed “delivered by hand”;
  • If a termination letter is sent to an employee in the post – make sure it is registered or couriered so that there is some evidence that the employee received the letter. In the Ayub Case the FWC made it clear that mere delivery of a document to an employee’s usual address would not constitute communication of a dismissal;
  • If an employer is sending the letter by email make sure a read receipt and delivery receipt is attached. It is worthwhile to make sure you have a current email address. It is also sensible to call the employee to let them know you have sent them an email;
  • If an employee is unable to be found, contact the next of kin for contact details of the employee or use other methods to determine their whereabouts (social media is often helpful);
  • Where an employee is dismissed with notice, the dismissal would take effect upon the last date of the notice period. This date must be clearly identified;
  • Where a dismissal is payment in lieu of notice, the dismissal must be clearly communicated to the employee so that he or she at least has a reasonable chance to find out that he or she has been dismissed.

A definite termination date, clearly communicated to an employee, will be of assistance when applications are made for unfair dismissal or adverse action where a strict time limit applies.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

Commission finds employer’s unsubstantiated allegations rendered dismissal unfair

Not mushroom for error

Where there is a factual dispute about allegations made against an employee, employers must ensure that the allegations are properly tested before proceeding to a disciplinary process. This will ensure that the employee has been provided with procedural fairness and any reasons relied on by the employer as grounds for dismissal are valid.

Read more...

FWC finds Philippine-based worker entitled to claim unfair dismissal

Objection overruled

When engaging overseas workers to perform work for an Australian entity, employers need to be mindful of the risks that such workers may be considered employees to whom the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) might apply.

Read more...

Commission finds employer’s ‘rushed’ investigation process of sexual harassment allegation renders dismissal unfair

Something worth waiting for

When conducting workplace investigations, one issue that we commonly face is ensuring that the process is completed in a timely manner to minimise any disruption and uncertainty in the workplace. However, whilst investigations should be completed as quickly as possible, this must not come at the expense of procedural fairness being provided to all employees involved.

Read more...

Commission finds employer’s unsubstantiated allegations rendered dismissal unfair

Not mushroom for error

Where there is a factual dispute about allegations made against an employee, employers must ensure that the allegations are properly tested before proceeding to a disciplinary process. This will ensure that the employee has been provided with procedural fairness and any reasons relied on by the employer as grounds for dismissal are valid.

Read more...

Commission finds role with additional 88km travel time was not suitable alternative employment

The road less travelled

An employer may apply to the Fair Work Commission to have an employee’s redundancy pay reduced to a specified amount (which may be nil) in circumstances where it has obtained “other acceptable employment” for the employee.

Read more...

FWC finds Philippine-based worker entitled to claim unfair dismissal

Objection overruled

When engaging overseas workers to perform work for an Australian entity, employers need to be mindful of the risks that such workers may be considered employees to whom the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) might apply.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.