Resources: Blogs

Pick and pay

Blogs
|

FWO crackdown on piecework rates

Last month, the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) launched unprecedented legal action in the Federal Court against a large mushroom farm that paid hundreds of its employees based on how much they picked at a rate of 60 to 80 cents per kilogram. It is alleged that the employees had been exploited and underpaid almost $650,000 in eight months.

Last month, the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) launched unprecedented legal action in the Federal Court against a large mushroom farm that paid hundreds of its employees based on how much they picked at a rate of 60 to 80 cents per kilogram. It is alleged that the employees had been exploited and underpaid almost $650,000 in eight months.

A piecework rate is payable where an employee gets paid per piece of work completed. This means the employee gets paid a certain amount for each item picked, packed, pruned or made. When an employee receives a piecework rate, this is paid instead of an hourly rate of pay.

The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) provides limited circumstances where an employee can be paid piecework rates. These include where:

  • An award or registered agreement allows for piece rate payments;
  • The employee isn’t covered by an award or registered agreement.

An award that does provide for piecework rates is the Horticulture Award 2010 and this was applicable to the mushroom farm employees.

Under the Award, an employee can be paid piecework rates; however, the employee must on average earn at least 15% more per hour than the minimum hourly rate prescribed under the Award for the applicable classification. There is also a requirement that if the employee is a casual, they receive the casual loading in addition to the piece work rate. The piecework arrangement must be in writing and be a genuine agreement. Time and wages records must be kept by the employer.

This case will be a test for the FW Act with respect to piecework rates and may impact not only on the Horticulture sector but also the Textiles, Clothing and Footwear industries that also utilise piecework rates.

Employers are reminded that if an employee is entitled to receive piece work rates and are paid accordingly, the employee must receive at least what they would have received had they been paid in accordance with the relevant industrial instrument.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

$15.3 million in penalties imposed on sushi restaurants and director for serious contraventions

Put your records on

The director and Chief Executive Officer of a group of four sushi restaurants which operated in NSW, the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory was recently ordered to pay $1.6 million for her involvement in contraventions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) by the Federal Court of Australia.

Read more...

FWO secures penalties against bar operator and external accounting firm

Closing time

The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) requires employers to keep certain employee records for a period of 7 years. These records are necessary to ensure that employees have been paid their minimum entitlements should an underpayment claim be made.

Read more...

Underpaying employer ordered to pay $475,200 in penalties

Pecuniary penalties no longer a matter of degrees

The Federal Court of Australia has issued one of its first penalty decisions since the High Court of Australia’s decision earlier this year of Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Pattinson [2022] HCA 13.

Read more...

Commission finds no objective or rational connection between an employee’s age and his flexible working request to work from home

The age of flexibility

An employee will only be eligible to request a flexible working arrangement if they are able to demonstrate that there is a sufficient nexus between one of the prescribed circumstances under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and the request itself.

Read more...

Employer’s “tick and flick” training on workplace policies rendered dismissal unfair

Not just the what, but also the why

When relying on a workplace policy as grounds for dismissal, employers must be able to clearly demonstrate that the employee is aware of the policy and has undergone meaningful training on the policy.

Read more...

Commission finds employer’s unsubstantiated allegations rendered dismissal unfair

Not mushroom for error

Where there is a factual dispute about allegations made against an employee, employers must ensure that the allegations are properly tested before proceeding to a disciplinary process. This will ensure that the employee has been provided with procedural fairness and any reasons relied on by the employer as grounds for dismissal are valid.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.