Resources: Blogs

“All spaghetti and no meatballs”

Blogs
|

FWO seeks penalties against a restaurant that deliberately disregarded advice and underpaid employees

It is no secret that the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) has been cracking down on employers breaching their employment obligations under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the FW Act) and exploiting vulnerable workers in order to gain financial and competitive advantage. Indeed, the Federal Government is very close to passing a Bill through Parliament that will not only impose much harsher penalties on employers but will also increase the FWO’s powers to investigate this type of behaviour.

It is no secret that the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) has been cracking down on employers breaching their employment obligations under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the FW Act) and exploiting vulnerable workers in order to gain financial and competitive advantage.

Indeed, the Federal Government is very close to passing a Bill through Parliament that will not only impose much harsher penalties on employers but will also increase the FWO’s powers to investigate this type of behaviour.

For most employers, contact from the FWO will arise as a result of an inadvertent breach of the FW Act. Once the employer realises there is an error in their compliance, steps will be taken to rectify it, by fixing underpayments and/or putting systems in place that ensure accurate records are being kept and employees are receiving their correct entitlements.

The FWO is more forgiving when employers act quickly in this regard to achieve compliance.

However, that leniency disappears when the employer does not swiftly act to rectify matters and continues to breach the FW Act, ignoring advice about their employment obligations.

The latest employer to feel the wrath of the FWO is popular Melbourne restaurant, Meatball and Wine Bar, and its owner, Mr Matteo Bruno.

Mr Bruno and his company are now due to face the Federal Circuit Court after the FWO filed proceedings against them alleging that they underpaid 26 workers across three of their restaurants – 10 of whom were visa holders and 22 of whom were in their twenties.

The total underpayment amount is alleged to have been $14,149 between July 2016 and October 2016, the highest individual underpayment being $1,419.16 for a wait staff who was paid a flat rate of $17.95 when he should have been paid $18.91 and $28.37 for overtime worked, under the Restaurant Industry Award 2010.

Following notice of the underpayment, Mr Bruno moved to repay the full amounts owing to the employees.

However, what Mr Bruno has not been able to rectify, and what the FWO is alleging in the proceedings (amongst other things), is the fact that he and the company received comprehensive pay and conditions guides from a private employment adviser and had the assistance of accountants when managing the company’s accounts and payroll administration yet still underpaid 26 employees.

The FWO is seeking penalties against both Mr Bruno and the company for breaching the FW Act.

Employers should not and cannot risk waiting until an employee lodges a complaint with the FWO to rectify pay mistakes – especially where they are aware a mistake has been made. The FWO also acts on its own initiative through proactive workplace audits and compliance campaigns, and this is how the Meatball and Wine Bar came to the FWO’s attention.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

$15.3 million in penalties imposed on sushi restaurants and director for serious contraventions

Put your records on

The director and Chief Executive Officer of a group of four sushi restaurants which operated in NSW, the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory was recently ordered to pay $1.6 million for her involvement in contraventions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) by the Federal Court of Australia.

Read more...

FWO secures penalties against bar operator and external accounting firm

Closing time

The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) requires employers to keep certain employee records for a period of 7 years. These records are necessary to ensure that employees have been paid their minimum entitlements should an underpayment claim be made.

Read more...

Underpaying employer ordered to pay $475,200 in penalties

Pecuniary penalties no longer a matter of degrees

The Federal Court of Australia has issued one of its first penalty decisions since the High Court of Australia’s decision earlier this year of Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Pattinson [2022] HCA 13.

Read more...

Court temporarily reinstates employee pending adverse action claim

BRB

The probation period is commonly used by employers to assess the suitability of an employee for ongoing employment. One of the reasons that the probation period is of benefit to employers is because, when aligned with the minimum employment period set out in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), it allows an employer to end the employment relationship before an employee becomes entitled to protection from unfair dismissal.

Read more...

How pre-employment checks minimise the risk of post-recruitment discoveries

Skeletons in the closet

You have hired an employee who appears to be perfect on paper, only to later discover that they have misrepresented or deliberately withheld information about their qualifications, employment history or problematic past. A simple and often overlooked way of mitigating unfortunate surprises like these is conducting pre-employment checks to verify whether a candidate is as suitable, qualified and impressive as their resume or interview has portrayed them to be.

Read more...

Employer did not force an employee to resign by enforcing its hybrid working arrangement

A direction you can’t resist

There is no doubt that the COVID-19 lockdowns have changed the way in which most businesses work. While working remotely has provided employers and employees with flexibility, many employers have now started directing employees to return to the workplace either full-time or under hybrid working arrangements.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.