Resources: Blogs

Handle with care

Blogs
|

Managing the new family and domestic violence leave entitlement

The introduction of family and domestic violence leave entitlements into modern awards and the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) last year was a significant development in Australian workplace relations.

The introduction of family and domestic violence leave entitlements into modern awards and the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) last year was a significant development in Australian workplace relations. It has prompted employers to now give considerable thought as to how well their workplace is equipped to deal with such situations involving their employees.

What is the entitlement?

In summary, employees are entitled to a minimum of five days of unpaid leave to deal with family and domestic violence matters. It may be taken by an employee if they are experiencing family and domestic violence and need to deal with the impact of family and domestic violence in circumstances where it is impractical for the employee to do so outside of their ordinary hours of work.

The leave may be accessed in single days, in one whole period or, by agreement, for a period of less than a day. It is available in full and immediately every twelve months of service (that is, it does not accrue throughout the year) and does not accrue from year to year.

The provisions in the modern awards and the FW Act provide examples of reasons why an employee may seek access to such leave, including attending urgent court hearings or making arrangements for their safety or the safety of a family member.

Implications for employers

In order for an employee to access this entitlement, there are certain notice and evidence requirements that must be satisfied. This inevitably leads to the disclosure of confidential and highly sensitive personal information about an employee and, in recognition of this, employers are obligated to take steps “as far as it is reasonably practicable” to ensure that the notice and evidence given is treated in a confidential manner.

However, employers also have the delicate task of balancing their obligations to the affected employee as well as protecting the health and safety of all other employees in the workplace. Acknowledging this difficult position, the relevant provisions do not prevent employers from disclosing such information if the disclosure is required by law, or is necessary to protect the life, health or safety of the employee or others (including fellow employees).

Practically speaking, employers will likely be required to disclose these types of situations to other employees (at least at a very high level or for administrative purposes), for example, to payroll staff who are required to maintain records of employee leave entitlements.

Best practice for employers

It is important that employers take steps to manage employee expectations in these sensitive circumstances. Employers should:

  • advise employees and managers, by way of training and a workplace policy, of the process for requesting/accessing such leave, as well as how issues of confidentiality will be balanced with safety obligations to all employees;
  • as far as reasonably practicable, consult with affected employees about the best strategies for maintaining confidentiality for their particular circumstances (noting that this may not be the same for each affected employee);
  • with care and clarity, explain to the affected employee why certain other managers and/or employees need to be informed of the situation; and
  • arrange for training and support to be provided to managers (and other employees who may find themselves privy to an affected employee’s circumstances, such as payroll) so that they are equipped to handle requests for this type of leave on both a practical and emotional level. There are also online resources being made available by independent organisations which may assist employees in this regard.

Please contact us if you would like our assistance with preparing a Family and Domestic Violence Leave policy and/or training.

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Similar articles

Employer’s “tick and flick” training on workplace policies rendered dismissal unfair

Not just the what, but also the why

When relying on a workplace policy as grounds for dismissal, employers must be able to clearly demonstrate that the employee is aware of the policy and has undergone meaningful training on the policy.

Read more...

Model Delegates’ Rights Terms in Modern Awards

Amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) introduced by the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act 2023 (Cth), required modern awards to include a term that provides for the exercise of the rights of workplace delegates. Amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) introduced by the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act 2023 (Cth), required modern awards to include a term that provides for the exercise of the rights of workplace delegates.

Read more...

Annual Wage Review Decison 2024

The Fair Work Commission’s Expert Panel announced on Monday, 3 June 2024 the outcome of its annual review of the national minimum wage and minimum wages under the modern awards.

Read more...

Commission finds no objective or rational connection between an employee’s age and his flexible working request to work from home

The age of flexibility

An employee will only be eligible to request a flexible working arrangement if they are able to demonstrate that there is a sufficient nexus between one of the prescribed circumstances under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and the request itself.

Read more...

Employer’s “tick and flick” training on workplace policies rendered dismissal unfair

Not just the what, but also the why

When relying on a workplace policy as grounds for dismissal, employers must be able to clearly demonstrate that the employee is aware of the policy and has undergone meaningful training on the policy.

Read more...

Commission finds employer’s unsubstantiated allegations rendered dismissal unfair

Not mushroom for error

Where there is a factual dispute about allegations made against an employee, employers must ensure that the allegations are properly tested before proceeding to a disciplinary process. This will ensure that the employee has been provided with procedural fairness and any reasons relied on by the employer as grounds for dismissal are valid.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.