Resources: Blogs

Reckless

Blogs
|

Self employer convicted and given jail time following death of worker

Conviction under work health and safety legalisation can result in significant fines and/or imprisonment.

Work health and safety legislation in Australia places significant duties and obligations on employers to ensure the health and safety of workers and others in the workplace.

Breaches of work health and safety duties constitute offences under work health and safety legislation and can lead to prosecution by a regulator. Conviction under work health and safety legalisation can result in significant fines and/or imprisonment.

The recent prosecution and conviction of an owner-operator in Victoria demonstrates the serious consequences that breaches of work health and safety obligations can have on businesses and individuals.

A Victorian Magistrates’ Court found the owner of a scrap metal business guilty of breaching the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic) (OHS Act) after a worker was fatally crushed by a metal bin.

The company owner was operating a forklift to lift a metal bin which the worker was standing in. When the metal bin was raised in the air, the worker fell through the corroded base of the bin before the bin itself fell from the forklift tines on top of the worker. The company owner did not, and had never, held a forklift licence and the bin itself had not been properly secured to the forklift.

Worksafe Victoria commenced proceedings against the company owner for breaches of the OHS Act, specifically:

  • The duty as a self-employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that persons are not exposed to work health and safety risks; and
  • The duty not to recklessly engage in conduct that places or may place another person in danger of serious injury without lawful excuse.

The company owner pleaded guilty to both breaches and, in December 2018, was sentenced to six months gaol and was ordered to pay a fine of $10,000 plus costs.

This conviction in Victoria is the first for a breach of the duty not to recklessly endanger a worker and indicates the seriousness with which the regulators and the courts will take a failure to comply with work health and safety duties. As noted above, a breach of work health and safety legislation is a criminal offence and could result in criminal conviction with penalties including fines or imprisonment or both for individuals and officers.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Similar articles

Sole trader convicted and fined for WHS breach resulting in death of worker

In a recent decision of the NSW District Court, a sole trader has been convicted and fined $100,000 for breaching his health and safety duty under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth), which resulted in workers being exposed to a risk of death or serious injury.

Read more...

The difficulties in balancing privacy and WHS obligations when handling employee personal information

To tell or not to tell

A recent decision of the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner has illustrated how difficult it can be for employers to balance their obligations under various workplace laws when managing ill and injured employees.

Read more...

Industrial manslaughter offence introduced in New South Wales

On 20 June 2024, the New South Wales Parliament passed legislation to include a new criminal offence of industrial manslaughter under work health and safety legislation.

Read more...

Commission finds employer’s unsubstantiated allegations rendered dismissal unfair

Not mushroom for error

Where there is a factual dispute about allegations made against an employee, employers must ensure that the allegations are properly tested before proceeding to a disciplinary process. This will ensure that the employee has been provided with procedural fairness and any reasons relied on by the employer as grounds for dismissal are valid.

Read more...

Commission finds role with additional 88km travel time was not suitable alternative employment

The road less travelled

An employer may apply to the Fair Work Commission to have an employee’s redundancy pay reduced to a specified amount (which may be nil) in circumstances where it has obtained “other acceptable employment” for the employee.

Read more...

FWC finds Philippine-based worker entitled to claim unfair dismissal

Objection overruled

When engaging overseas workers to perform work for an Australian entity, employers need to be mindful of the risks that such workers may be considered employees to whom the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) might apply.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.