Resources: Blogs

The fine cut

Blogs
|

Small Business Employers and Anti-Discrimination Legislation

Small businesses have a litany of rules, regulations and red tape they are required to comply with, including registration and tax compliance, employee minimum entitlements, fair trading, work health and safety and privacy obligations.

Small businesses have a litany of rules, regulations and red tape they are required to comply with, including registration and tax compliance, employee minimum entitlements, fair trading, work health and safety and privacy obligations.

Small businesses are also subject to anti-discrimination legislation which prohibits direct and indirect discrimination on the basis of a protected attribute. Australia’s federal anti-discrimination legislation prevents discrimination on the basis of:

  • Sex under the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) (SD Act);
  • Age under the Age Discrimination Act 2004 (Cth);
  • Disability under the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth); and
  • Race under the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth).

These complex areas of anti-discrimination law are often overlooked even though non-compliance can lead to serious legal and reputational risks.

For example, earlier this year, it was reported that a sex discrimination complaint was lodged against a suburban barbershop for refusing to cut a girl’s hair. The barbershop owner refused on the basis that he was not trained to cut women’s hair and was only trained to cut men’s hair. The complaint was made to the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) on the basis that the barber shop had breached the SD Act.

Discrimination under the SD Act

The SD Act specifically prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, intersex status, relationship status, pregnancy, breastfeeding and family responsibilities.

Under the SD Act, discrimination on the basis of sex occurs when a person is treated less favourably than another person of a different sex would be treated in the same (or not materially different) circumstances.

The SD Act applies in relation to areas of public life including employment, education, the provision of goods, services and facilities and providing accommodation.

Exemptions

Exemptions from the operation of the SD Act are also available.

For instance, it will not be unlawful to discriminate on the basis of sex in employment where there is a “genuine occupational qualification” requirement. This includes staffing for fitting rooms and where the duties of a position will include conducting clothing or body searches. Section 32 of the SD Act also provides that it will not be unlawful to discriminate where services are only capable of being provided to members of one sex, for example, for health conditions.

An organisation may also apply to the AHRC for a temporary exemption. The exemption may be granted by the AHRC and has the effect of allowing certain actions not to be unlawful. For example, an organisation may apply for an exemption where it wishes to provide certain services such as male or female-only health clinics.

Lessons for employers

The barbershop matter settled last month and the owner was required to make a public statement that he would cut hair of any gender person if it was within his capabilities.

For small business employers, it is important that they are aware of the requirements of anti-discrimination legislation which apply to both employment and with the provision of services to customers and the possible consequences including complaints and payment of damages for breaches.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Similar articles

Employer ordered to pay damages for unlawful discrimination of employee with breastfeeding responsibilities

Let’s assess the damage

In October 2023, we reported on a decision of the Australian Capital Territory Civil and Administrative Tribunal that found an employer had unlawfully discriminated against an employee because of her breastfeeding responsibilities. The Tribunal has now handed down its decision in relation to the remedies flowing from that contravention.

Read more...

Sole trader convicted and fined for WHS breach resulting in death of worker

In a recent decision of the NSW District Court, a sole trader has been convicted and fined $100,000 for breaching his health and safety duty under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth), which resulted in workers being exposed to a risk of death or serious injury.

Read more...

Industrial manslaughter offence introduced in New South Wales

On 20 June 2024, the New South Wales Parliament passed legislation to include a new criminal offence of industrial manslaughter under work health and safety legislation.

Read more...

FWC finds employer’s assumptions about employee’s capacity rendered dismissal unfair

You need to chill out

If an employer is questioning the capacity of an ill or injured worker’s ability to fulfil the inherent requirements of their position, they may consider testing the legitimacy of an employee’s prognoses and medical advice. In these circumstances, the employer should be aware of their obligations to the employee and the potential consequences of failing to satisfy them.

Read more...

FWC finds dismissal harsh and unreasonable given employer’s communication blunder of policy changes

Sliding into your DM’s

It is best practice for employers to ensure that their policies and procedures are properly communicated and understood by employees, especially in circumstances where the policy relates to important topics such as the health and safety of employees.

Read more...

Poor redundancy process results in successful workers compensation claim

Coffee catastrophe

There are a number of legal obligations and risks that an employer must consider when implementing any form of disciplinary or dismissal process. These are not limited to claims made under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) but can also include the risk of claims made under anti-discrimination or workers compensation legislation.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.

Subscribe

* indicates required