Resources: Blogs

While induction programs are a way for employers to introduce new employees to their organisation, a WHS induction program is an equally essential step in the new starter process

Blogs
|

The importance of WHS training during employee induction

The implementation and delivery of a work health and safety (WHS) induction program is an important part of the development of a positive workplace health and safety culture for an organisation.

The implementation and delivery of a work health and safety (WHS) induction program is an important part of the development of a positive workplace health and safety culture for an organisation.

While induction programs are a way for employers to introduce new employees to their organisation, a WHS induction program is an equally essential step in the new starter process.

A WHS induction program will usually cover a wide range of work health and safety issues including the health and safety responsibilities of the employer and the employee as well as the organisation’s process for reporting incidents and hazards in the workplace, risk management procedures, and its emergency and first aid procedures.

 

In some cases a two-part WHS program is appropriate:

  1. A general component introducing new employees to the general safety obligations, policies and procedures of your organisation; and
  1. A position/site specific component which identifies specific hazards and risks relevant to the employee’s position or location and instructs the employee in the safe system of work for the completion of tasks or in the use of equipment or materials (such as through Safe Work Method Statements). For example, an employee working in an office predominately in sedentary duties would face different safety risks to an outdoor employee who performs manual handling duties and uses heavy equipment.

 

Existing employees who have transferred from another department or location, or employees who are have returned to work after a period out of the workforce should also undertake WHS induction training.

WHS induction should not be limited to employees. Under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) employers have a primary duty of care to ensure the health and safety of all “workers”, defined to include contractors or subcontractors (and their employees), labour hire employees, apprentices and trainees, volunteers, outworkers and work experience students. WHS induction programs should also be extended to all such “workers”.

In April 2015, Norco Co-operative Limited entered into an enforceable undertaking with WorkCover NSW following an incident where a worker suffered injury after he became caught in a compactor. As part of the undertaking, Norco agreed to develop and introduce a WHS induction component for its online learning management system. The WHS induction program is required to be to be accessed and completed by all new Norco employees.

In Humphries v Shoalhaven City Council [2012] NSWDC 216, Shoalhaven City Council was found to be in breach of its duty of care under the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) for failing to provide training and induction to a labour hire employee who suffered injury because he was required to lift heavy concrete manholes. Levy J held in this case that a workplace induction for the safe lifting of manholes should have been provided to the labour hire employee before he was asked to perform the task. The labour hire employee was awarded $753,369.59 in damages.

A WHS induction program offers employers an opportunity to ensure that all employees receive relevant training. Similarly keeping proper records proving that WHS training was conducted is important, particularly in workers compensation matters where there may be a claim for work injury damages or where there is an investigation by WorkCover. Such records may assist in showing that the employer appropriately provided training and instruction to an employee in compliance with their duties.

 

Similar articles

How pre-employment checks minimise the risk of post-recruitment discoveries

Skeletons in the closet

You have hired an employee who appears to be perfect on paper, only to later discover that they have misrepresented or deliberately withheld information about their qualifications, employment history or problematic past. A simple and often overlooked way of mitigating unfortunate surprises like these is conducting pre-employment checks to verify whether a candidate is as suitable, qualified and impressive as their resume or interview has portrayed them to be.

Read more...

Sole trader convicted and fined for WHS breach resulting in death of worker

In a recent decision of the NSW District Court, a sole trader has been convicted and fined $100,000 for breaching his health and safety duty under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth), which resulted in workers being exposed to a risk of death or serious injury.

Read more...

Industrial manslaughter offence introduced in New South Wales

On 20 June 2024, the New South Wales Parliament passed legislation to include a new criminal offence of industrial manslaughter under work health and safety legislation.

Read more...

Court temporarily reinstates employee pending adverse action claim

BRB

The probation period is commonly used by employers to assess the suitability of an employee for ongoing employment. One of the reasons that the probation period is of benefit to employers is because, when aligned with the minimum employment period set out in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), it allows an employer to end the employment relationship before an employee becomes entitled to protection from unfair dismissal.

Read more...

How pre-employment checks minimise the risk of post-recruitment discoveries

Skeletons in the closet

You have hired an employee who appears to be perfect on paper, only to later discover that they have misrepresented or deliberately withheld information about their qualifications, employment history or problematic past. A simple and often overlooked way of mitigating unfortunate surprises like these is conducting pre-employment checks to verify whether a candidate is as suitable, qualified and impressive as their resume or interview has portrayed them to be.

Read more...

Employer did not force an employee to resign by enforcing its hybrid working arrangement

A direction you can’t resist

There is no doubt that the COVID-19 lockdowns have changed the way in which most businesses work. While working remotely has provided employers and employees with flexibility, many employers have now started directing employees to return to the workplace either full-time or under hybrid working arrangements.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.