Resources: Blogs

Great HR starts with a simple question: “How’s everything going?”

Blogs
|

We Don’t Talk Anymore: The “Human” in HR – Part 3

Human resources management is experiencing a digital revolution as online platforms and data collection solutions flood the market. If the make-up of a workforce can be understood and managed through data alone, will future HR departments be the domain of data analysts?

Human resources management is experiencing a digital revolution as online platforms and data collection solutions flood the market.

If the make-up of a workforce can be understood and managed through data alone, will future HR departments be the domain of data analysts?

In this final instalment of our series about the “Human” in HR, we consider the value of authentic human-to-human interactions in three central functions of HR: retention, dispute resolution and engagement.

 

1. Retention

Employee retention is vital to a successful business. It is widely acknowledged that retaining good people improves productivity and minimises the costs associated with recruiting and training new employees.

One way to predict retention is by understanding employee satisfaction. If an employee is unhappy in the workplace, they are unlikely to stick around for very long. Gauging employee satisfaction can give business leaders insight into areas requiring improvement, and digital data collection has been very helpful in this regard.

However, asking employees to anonymously “rate” their satisfaction has its pitfalls – surveys can be outright ignored and participants can give false, sarcastic or “funny” answers which skew the results. Furthermore, providing a “rating” doesn’t allow room for the specifics of a response to be articulated.

Retention is about an individual employee’s satisfaction in the workplace and digital data collection and online tools don’t adequately account for an individual’s experience. Great HR starts with a simple question: “How’s everything going?” Hearing an individual employee’s response to this question can provide more information than a survey could ever hope to collect. Real conversations are two sided, meaning that an employer (through their HR person) can demonstrate genuine interest in an individual and build a rapport, and we all know that feeling valued is a major factor in any employee’s decision to stay or move on.

When it comes to employee retention, person to person interaction not only demonstrates that an employee is valued but also provides the organisation with an opportunity to discuss an employee’s thoughts about the organisation. People can talk people out of leaving or turn a situation around, a data set can’t.

 

2. Dispute resolution

Managing the relationships between employees and managers is a central function of HR, and dispute resolution walks hand in hand with this responsibility.

When disputes arise, they can only really be dealt with in person and it helps where there are existing relationships with the parties. This means putting away the data and venturing out from behind the computer screen to regularly take the ‘temperature’ of the organisation or individual teams in person. Putting in a personal appearance demonstrates to employees that HR is more than a data collection point or centralised inbox and is made up of humans who can help when issues arise. If managers and employees know and are comfortable with their HR contacts, they are more likely to accept HR’s guidance in dispute resolution processes when things get tough.

The risk with data and digital platforms is that they can create distance between HR and the employees.

 

3. Engagement

Engagement is all about “buy-in” – how committed are employees to the goals of their team and the overall mission of the organisation?

Employers use all kinds of tech tactics to improve buy-in, from specially developed apps to online learning and development programs. Often, HR are recruited to manage these engagement initiatives, but how effective are they?

Research shows that employees retain more information and respond more positively to information when it is delivered in person rather than through a digital platform or even through a video conference.

HR has a special responsibility in this regard to ensure that its message (and the message of the organisation) is being received and absorbed. Where business goals or other workplace news needs to be disseminated, employees are more likely to absorb the information if it is delivered in person. Even in a group setting, employees are more likely to buy-in if HR deliver training or make announcements in person rather than send an email or provide a link to a video or online course.

 

Our thoughts

Without a doubt, there is some amazing technology out there that is improving the information that HR can access. However, digital technology should be embraced as a tool to aide businesses and employees to be better at what they do – it should not replace genuinely meaningful human interaction in the workplace, particularly for HR, whose work involves understanding and managing the complexities of human beings.

 

Similar articles

FWC finds evolving technology not a significant role change for IT employee

Head in the cloud

Organisational change is a constant for business – whether it involves wider cultural change within a company, the introduction of new technology or systems of work, or even a restructure or downsizing of the workforce.

Read more...

Commission orders parties to stop yelling in the workplace

Quiet, please

The Fair Work Commission recently issued interim orders in an application for orders to stop bullying, which required the parties to, amongst other things, treat each other with respect and dignity, and to not yell in an unreasonable manner.

Read more...

FWC upholds dismissals from workplace with “robust environment”

A break from banter

It is becoming increasingly challenging for employers and employees to understand where the line is between a relaxed, open and friendly workplace culture

Read more...

Court temporarily reinstates employee pending adverse action claim

BRB

The probation period is commonly used by employers to assess the suitability of an employee for ongoing employment. One of the reasons that the probation period is of benefit to employers is because, when aligned with the minimum employment period set out in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), it allows an employer to end the employment relationship before an employee becomes entitled to protection from unfair dismissal.

Read more...

How pre-employment checks minimise the risk of post-recruitment discoveries

Skeletons in the closet

You have hired an employee who appears to be perfect on paper, only to later discover that they have misrepresented or deliberately withheld information about their qualifications, employment history or problematic past. A simple and often overlooked way of mitigating unfortunate surprises like these is conducting pre-employment checks to verify whether a candidate is as suitable, qualified and impressive as their resume or interview has portrayed them to be.

Read more...

Employer did not force an employee to resign by enforcing its hybrid working arrangement

A direction you can’t resist

There is no doubt that the COVID-19 lockdowns have changed the way in which most businesses work. While working remotely has provided employers and employees with flexibility, many employers have now started directing employees to return to the workplace either full-time or under hybrid working arrangements.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.