Resources: Blogs

All Eyes on Me

Blogs
|

Workplace surveillance

Technology is often used to make the performance of our daily or work tasks easier – however it has become increasingly sophisticated and can now be used to measure and monitor our every move and task.

Technology is often used to make the performance of our daily or work tasks easier – however it has become increasingly sophisticated and can now be used to measure and monitor our every move and task.

Recently, financial institution Barclays introduced a new tracking devices system called “OccupEye” underneath employee workstations in the UK. The OccupEye devices use heat and motion sensors to record how long employees are spending at their desks. Barclays has assured employees that the devices will be used to assess the use of the office space and will not be used for monitoring employees or productivity levels.

OccupEye technology has previously been the subject of scrutiny when they were installed (and promptly removed) at the desks of employees at the UK newspaper The Telegraph in January 2016.

This year, companies have shown an increased openness to new technology in the workplace, even encouraging the implanting of microchips into employees. The microchips allow employees to enter and exit the premises and access and use corporate technology. In our previous blog I, Robot: The “Human” in HR – Part 2we looked at the use of data and technology in human resources including GPS and fitness trackers, and real time monitoring of employee morale using email software.

The use of such technology in the workplace raises issues about workplace surveillance and the collection and use of employees private information. Many workplaces have different surveillance devices in place to protect company property, monitor performance, ensure compliance with a code of conduct or to ensure work health and safety.

In NSW, workplace surveillance is governed by the Workplace Surveillance Act 2005 (NSW) (WS Act). Under the WS Act, surveillance is defined to include camera, computer or tracking surveillance. The WS Act requires employers to notify employees in writing before conducting surveillance of an employee. In accordance with sub-section 10(4) of the WS Act, this notice must state:

  • the kind of surveillance to be carried out (whether camera, computer and/or tracking);
  • how the surveillance will be carried out;
  • when the surveillance will start;
  • whether the surveillance will be continuous or intermittent; and
  • whether the surveillance will be ongoing or for a specified period of time.

The WS Act also sets out additional requirements depending on the method of surveillance to be used.

 

Lessons for employers

Before introducing workplace surveillance, employers should ensure that employees have been notified that they may be recorded, monitored or tracked. Notification can be achieved by:

  • Telling employees what will be monitored;
  • Posting signs about the activities that will be monitored;
  • Incorporating provisions disclosing surveillance into contracts of employment; and
  • Implementing supporting policies and procedures.

There is no doubt that information obtained through surveillance may be useful to protect an employer’s interests or in Barclay’s case to assess office space utilisation. Equally however, employers must balance this against employee privacy considerations.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

The importance of making policies accessible and easy to understand

Tell me in layman’s terms

Drafting workplace policies and procedures can be a daunting exercise – it requires a careful balance of including (or omitting) information that is necessary from a legal standpoint, whilst still remaining easy to understand and follow for employees.

Read more...

Fair Work Commission finds out-of-hours drink driving offence was not a valid reason for dismissal

Off the clock

Generally, the way in which an employee conducts themselves out-of-hours does not fall within the realm of what the employer can supervise or control. However, there are times where an employee’s conduct after business hours and away from work can impact the employment relationship.

Read more...

Vaccinations and the workplace

Shots fired

One of the most topical questions for employers during the COVID-19 pandemic has been whether they need to introduce policies that mandate vaccinations and, if so, what can be done to enforce them in the workplace.

Read more...

Court temporarily reinstates employee pending adverse action claim

BRB

The probation period is commonly used by employers to assess the suitability of an employee for ongoing employment. One of the reasons that the probation period is of benefit to employers is because, when aligned with the minimum employment period set out in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), it allows an employer to end the employment relationship before an employee becomes entitled to protection from unfair dismissal.

Read more...

How pre-employment checks minimise the risk of post-recruitment discoveries

Skeletons in the closet

You have hired an employee who appears to be perfect on paper, only to later discover that they have misrepresented or deliberately withheld information about their qualifications, employment history or problematic past. A simple and often overlooked way of mitigating unfortunate surprises like these is conducting pre-employment checks to verify whether a candidate is as suitable, qualified and impressive as their resume or interview has portrayed them to be.

Read more...

Employer did not force an employee to resign by enforcing its hybrid working arrangement

A direction you can’t resist

There is no doubt that the COVID-19 lockdowns have changed the way in which most businesses work. While working remotely has provided employers and employees with flexibility, many employers have now started directing employees to return to the workplace either full-time or under hybrid working arrangements.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.